←back to thread

517 points xbar | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.206s | source
Show context
smoothjazz ◴[] No.39143094[source]
Glad to see Israel face some responsibility for its horrific acts against civilians.

> The court ruled that Israel must do all it can to prevent genocide, including refraining from killing Palestinians or causing harm to them

Sounds like a ceasefire to me. How else would they do this? Definitely not with any of the military tactics Israel is currently using.

replies(9): >>39143256 #>>39143604 #>>39146080 #>>39146492 #>>39146501 #>>39146587 #>>39146634 #>>39148539 #>>39160386 #
shmatt ◴[] No.39146080[source]
Except SA specifically asked the court to require a ceasefire, which would have immediate consequences via security council vote and no more munitions landing in Israel. And the judges voted it down

This isn't a read between the lines situation, because SA's request was specifically for the court to temporarily rule for a full immediate ceasefire until the larger case could be heard

What is interesting here is that by mis-reading the verdict like yourself, and Israel assuming the worst, both sides immediately came out saying today was a huge win. So at least we have that, everyone (but the Palestinians, who aren't a side in this case) is happy

replies(3): >>39146496 #>>39146568 #>>39146800 #
smoothjazz ◴[] No.39146496[source]
Honestly I'm not trying to mis-read the verdict which is why I asked the question. I think all of Israel's strategies to date include the death of Palestinians. Since that's explicitly forbidden with that ruling, how will they continue to fight? Will they just ignore the ruling or change tactics?
replies(4): >>39146523 #>>39146853 #>>39149749 #>>39149801 #
golergka[dead post] ◴[] No.39149749[source]
[flagged]
1. smoothjazz ◴[] No.39150377[source]
I don't believe this and the court found reason to further investigate genocide. The statements from Israeli leadership alone contradict what you're saying.