←back to thread

517 points xbar | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.564s | source
Show context
thsksbd ◴[] No.39149093[source]
The ICJ punted.

The ruling is a joke, how can you rule against the defendant and yet order the defendant to monitor themselves?

The ICJ knew if it found against Israel it would loose all credibility outside the West, but it also had too much political pressure from the West to rule for Israel.

replies(2): >>39149168 #>>39149241 #
JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.39149168[source]
> ICJ punted

Yes. But this isn’t the final ruling.

South Africa asked for something analogous to a preliminary injunction. The ICJ declined to order a preliminary ceasefire. Instead, the case will be tried as usual.

replies(1): >>39149300 #
1. thsksbd ◴[] No.39149300[source]
Which will take years that the Palestinians do not have
replies(1): >>39149742 #
2. JumpCrisscross ◴[] No.39149742[source]
> take years that the Palestinians do not have

Sure. I don’t think the ICJ was envisioned as an incapacitating body. Instead its existence is a deterrent. A venue for retribution and possibly even restitution.