←back to thread

614 points nickthegreek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mgreg ◴[] No.39121867[source]
Unsurprising but disappointing none-the-less. Let’s just try to learn from it.

It’s popular in the AI space to claim altruism and openness; OpenAI, Anthropic and xAI (the new Musk one) all have a funky governance structure because they want to be a public good. The challenge is once any of these (or others) start to gain enough traction that they are seen as having a good chance at reaping billions in profits things change.

And it’s not just AI companies and this isn’t new. This is art of human nature and will always be.

We should be putting more emphasis and attention on truly open AI models (open training data, training source code & hyperparameters, model source code, weights) so the benefits of AI accrue to the public and not just a few companies.

[edit - eliminated specific company mentions]

replies(17): >>39122377 #>>39122548 #>>39122564 #>>39122633 #>>39122672 #>>39122681 #>>39122683 #>>39122910 #>>39123084 #>>39123321 #>>39124167 #>>39124930 #>>39125603 #>>39126566 #>>39126621 #>>39127428 #>>39132151 #
RespectYourself ◴[] No.39122633[source]
OpenAI: pioneer in the field of fraudulently putting "open" in your name and being anything but.
replies(5): >>39122838 #>>39126517 #>>39127309 #>>39130117 #>>39132836 #
quantum_state ◴[] No.39122838[source]
Similar naming pattern, like North Korea calls itself “ Democratic People's Republic of Korea” … it cannot be further from being democratic.
replies(4): >>39122913 #>>39123123 #>>39123586 #>>39124478 #
RespectYourself ◴[] No.39123123[source]
Nice comparison. And also certain political factions in the USA try to hide the shamefulness of laws they propose by giving them names that are directly opposed to what they'll do.

The "Defense of Marriage Act" comes to mind. There was one so bad that a judge ordered the authors to change it, but I can't find it at the moment.

replies(4): >>39123299 #>>39124107 #>>39124527 #>>39136897 #
rlt ◴[] No.39123299[source]
All political factions are guilty of this. Patriot Act, Inflation Reduction Act, Affordable Care Act, etc.
replies(2): >>39124123 #>>39124538 #
pyuser583 ◴[] No.39124123[source]
USA PATRIOT Act was an acronym, actual name was Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001.
replies(1): >>39125418 #
kibibu ◴[] No.39125418{3}[source]
You think they came up with the long name and THEN were astonished to discover that it spells "PATRIOT"?
replies(1): >>39125826 #
1. RespectYourself ◴[] No.39125826{4}[source]
Yep. That's for sure a revisionist definition.

See also: "Digital Versatile Disc"