←back to thread

614 points nickthegreek | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tptacek ◴[] No.39121885[source]
If you bought into the idea that OpenAI was developing advanced ML/AI technology as a public utility, isn't that a bit on you? They don't actually owe anybody anything, and never have, so (a) the time to really hammer them on this stuff was a decade ago and (b) they didn't actually take anything from the public to do this, so even a decade ago they could have said "ok whatever" and gotten on with their day.

It would be different, maybe, if everybody else in the industry stood aside and let OpenAI monopolize development of transformer-style-AI (or whatever it is we're calling this) for the common good. But nobody did that; the opposite thing happened. This space has been a Gem Saloon knife fight just waiting to pop off for the entirety of OpenAI's existance.

replies(5): >>39121912 #>>39122508 #>>39122973 #>>39123185 #>>39127458 #
1. warkdarrior ◴[] No.39122508[source]
OpenAI promised in their IRS statements to provide documentation on their operations. So they owe the public something, and now they reneged on their promise.

This article is just pointing out that OpenAI went back on their promises of financial transparency.

replies(1): >>39122938 #
2. tptacek ◴[] No.39122938[source]
What favorable tax treatment has OpenAI received?
replies(1): >>39124342 #
3. wewtyflakes ◴[] No.39124342[source]
They were founded as a non-profit; https://openai.com/our-structure.
replies(1): >>39124736 #
4. tptacek ◴[] No.39124736{3}[source]
Right, but the operating organization wasn't.