←back to thread

614 points nickthegreek | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
tptacek ◴[] No.39121885[source]
If you bought into the idea that OpenAI was developing advanced ML/AI technology as a public utility, isn't that a bit on you? They don't actually owe anybody anything, and never have, so (a) the time to really hammer them on this stuff was a decade ago and (b) they didn't actually take anything from the public to do this, so even a decade ago they could have said "ok whatever" and gotten on with their day.

It would be different, maybe, if everybody else in the industry stood aside and let OpenAI monopolize development of transformer-style-AI (or whatever it is we're calling this) for the common good. But nobody did that; the opposite thing happened. This space has been a Gem Saloon knife fight just waiting to pop off for the entirety of OpenAI's existance.

replies(5): >>39121912 #>>39122508 #>>39122973 #>>39123185 #>>39127458 #
swalsh ◴[] No.39121912[source]
I'm not completely convinced OpenAI is not a public good. I've started using it at my company, we found literally millions in value... and it cost us about $60 in tokens.
replies(4): >>39121954 #>>39121968 #>>39122158 #>>39122356 #
1. tptacek ◴[] No.39121954[source]
It's a company, with a good product. I like Lao Gan Ma chili crisp way out of proportion to what it costs me, but they're still just a firm. :)