←back to thread

FAQ on Leaving Google

(social.clawhammer.net)
462 points mrled | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
charles_f ◴[] No.39034842[source]
> it makes no sense to either love or be angry at “Google”

Someone decided to handle this situation that way, so one has a perfect right to be angry at them, and generalize that as "being angry at Google".

The author takes it with philosophy and pragmatism, that's admirable and I'm certainly not one to tell them how they should feel. But other factors indicate that his situation was also prone for that positiveness (feeling like a relief because of golden handcuffs, long tenure in a stock-distributing tech company + director level meaning that there's likely no concerns regarding money, side career already underway, maybe a relief to have some change).

Others might not be in the same situation, and are now jobless in in slow economy, with tenuous savings, rent or mortgage coming up. They might feel outright furious for a layoff that they have neither control on, nor were a reason for, and that shows no face to take responsibility - and they're completely entitled to feel that way, if that helps them cope. I'd say it makes sense to me, and don't feel bad for being angry if that's how you feel.

replies(8): >>39035194 #>>39035837 #>>39035912 #>>39036173 #>>39036423 #>>39037691 #>>39038335 #>>39039073 #
scarface_74 ◴[] No.39036173[source]
If you worked at Google for any number of years, is there any reason to have tenuous savings?

Heck in any major city in the US, your average CRUD enterprise dev is probably making twice as much as the local median household income and should have savings

replies(1): >>39036519 #
charles_f ◴[] No.39036519[source]
If you worked there as an entry developer for a couple years in an expensive city with a student loan, you'd have a reason, yes. Or if you were an immigrant with a family to support abroad. Or if you are divorced and need to pay spousal and child support.

A number of reasons, yes.

replies(1): >>39036766 #
scarface_74 ◴[] No.39036766[source]
I bet you even in that “expensive city” you’re making more than twice the median compensation in that same city.
replies(1): >>39036885 #
Rebelgecko ◴[] No.39036885[source]
In many expensive cities the median compensation is well below the poverty line
replies(1): >>39037993 #
throwaway2037 ◴[] No.39037993[source]
Uh, what? Can you name some and provide numbers?
replies(1): >>39048907 #
Rebelgecko ◴[] No.39048907[source]
In Los Angeles the median individual income is $30k.

For an individual, HUD puts the "low income" threshold at $70k and "very low income" at 44k.

replies(1): >>39053609 #
1. astrange ◴[] No.39053609{3}[source]
That's not a good way to think about income because people live in households, and the median income of all individuals includes people who aren't expected to contribute to the household income like children.
replies(1): >>39059577 #
2. Rebelgecko ◴[] No.39059577[source]
Ok.

The mean household income is $70k and the average household size is like 2.7.

For a household of 2 people, the HUD low income threshold is $80k. For a household of 3 or 4 it's $90-100k. Although they'd be a bit above the HUD very low income threshold