←back to thread

FAQ on Leaving Google

(social.clawhammer.net)
462 points mrled | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.324s | source
Show context
throw_pm23 ◴[] No.39034667[source]
A nice writeup but

"achieving really cool things in the [..] Ads [..] divisions"?

Come on, no need to fool anyone now that you are free.. There's nothing cool to be achieved in ads, unless you were working to dismantle the entire industry from the inside.

replies(2): >>39034720 #>>39034992 #
cybrox ◴[] No.39034720[source]
Morally? Probably not.

In terms of challenge and complexity? Sure!

It's the same thing as working in military tech. You shouldn't be a huge fan of blowing people to bits but the challenges and solutions are incredible.

replies(1): >>39034956 #
brap ◴[] No.39034956[source]
Also, morally - I would argue that the billions of people who choose to use Google for free every single day because it makes their live better, thanks to ads, might think it’s pretty cool too.

Please stop demonizing the very thing you enjoy using. If not you then probably your parents, etc. Google became so valuable because it gives people a lot of value.

replies(2): >>39035616 #>>39037737 #
linkgoron ◴[] No.39035616[source]
That's like saying that people should feel thankful for paying their taxes because that's what paves their roads and builds their schools. Yes, ads bring in money, and maybe they do enable Search - but it's at most a necessary evil, not something to celebrate.
replies(5): >>39035704 #>>39035736 #>>39035793 #>>39036644 #>>39036704 #
1. e_y_ ◴[] No.39036644[source]
I'm on board with paying taxes in an abstract conceptual sense. It's generally how it's spent and how it's collected (who pays how much) that are problematic.

Also worth noting that Google originally aimed to create less intrusive ads. Relevant, text-only ads with no Javascript, clearly distinguished from the search results by being on the side instead of above the search results. Those days have long since passed.