←back to thread

FAQ on Leaving Google

(social.clawhammer.net)
462 points mrled | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
thrtythreeforty ◴[] No.39035233[source]
The author also published [1] an email he wrote at the beginning of his tenure. It is amazing how alien and out of place early Google sounds in today's corporate environment. They have completely eroded the perception that Google is this kind of place:

> Google is the opposite: it's like a giant grad-school. Half the programmers have PhD's, and everyone treats the place like a giant research playground [...] Every once in a while, a manager skims over the bubbling activity, looking for products to "reap" from the creative harvest. The programmers completely drive the company, it's really amazing. I kept waiting for people to walk up to me and ask me if I had declared my major yet. They not only encourage personal experimentation and innovation, they demand it. Every programmer is required to spend 20% of their time working on random personal projects. If you get overloaded by a crisis, then that 20% personal time accrues anyway. Nearly every Google technology you know (maps, earth, gmail) started out as somebody's 20% project, I think.

Even if this was only half-true back then, there's very little you could do to convince me that it's true at all now. This culture and the public perception of it has been squandered.

[1]: https://social.clawhammer.net/blog/posts/2005-09-25-FirstWee...

replies(6): >>39035428 #>>39035523 #>>39035569 #>>39035617 #>>39035738 #>>39046460 #
blibble ◴[] No.39035523[source]
> early every Google technology you know (maps, earth, gmail) started out as somebody's 20% project, I think.

maps and earth were both acquisitions

replies(2): >>39035571 #>>39035666 #
dylan604 ◴[] No.39035666[source]
you say acquisitions, others might say stolen.
replies(1): >>39035755 #
sjwhevvvvvsj ◴[] No.39035755[source]
They bought the companies; that’s very literally not stealing.
replies(1): >>39035955 #
dylan604 ◴[] No.39035955[source]
So, you're totally discounting the work of Terravision

"The Billion Dollar Code" is a Netflix series about the lawsuit of Google trouncing the little guys. [0] is a brief bit from its creator about the impetus for the show. If you haven't seen it, it's pretty good. In the [0], they compare it to The Social Network being from the Zucks point of view, aka the winner. This story is told from the view of the losing side.

[0] https://variety.com/2021/streaming/global/netflix-the-billio...!

replies(2): >>39036057 #>>39036354 #
WalterBright ◴[] No.39036354{3}[source]
I've seen plenty of "documentaries" which were really just pushing an agenda. You can distinguish advocacy from accuracy usually within the first few sentences.
replies(3): >>39036513 #>>39037171 #>>39039265 #
1. dylan604 ◴[] No.39036513{4}[source]
Which is also said about anything that tends to go against the views of the other side. It's a bit of entertainment "based" on true events. Nobody claims it is the gospel according to.... They even qualify this in the interview I linked.

The majority of people have no idea on how/when/where the products they use on a daily basis originated. By the time a FAANG type of company releases something, you can pretty much be assured there are casualties along the way.