The conflict between “uncomfortable culture” and “golden handcuffs” was becoming intolerable.
Amen :_(
replies(2):
Amen :_(
1. The 4% number comes from the Trinity study, which found that 95% of the time you have >$0 after 30 years. If you're >30 years from death now, a more appropriate benchmark might be 3% or possibly 3.5%.
2. $100k/yr post tax is more than $100k/yr pretax, even if it's mostly long term capital gains and dividend taxes.
3. Health insurance $$$.
So the number for you is probably a little higher maybe $5m to switch to 3% and add an additional $50k for tax and health insurance costs.
But yea the general point stands. Someone working as a director probably pulling >$1m/yr, with a long tenure, almost definitely has way over that amount. (I wouldn't be surprised if it was $20m+)