←back to thread

186 points drak0n1c | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.221s | source
Show context
memonkey ◴[] No.38483759[source]
Why? Why is this a thing?

..."and destroy a wide variety of aerial threats"...

Okay, but what/who is the root problem that created this company to solve this issue? The either real or perceived threats that the United States and its media affiliations have concocted has really put a tamper on its own ability to make policy decisions that benefit its own peoples. We are spending BILLIONS of dollars on wars in other countries WHILE neglecting our own. Why do we need another private company help with this?

Another question for a separate answer: why can't we spend that money on domestic issues?

replies(4): >>38483777 #>>38483788 #>>38483789 #>>38483803 #
fastball ◴[] No.38483788[source]
We are already spending money on this type of problem. Realistically, this looks like a more cost-effective solution. So you have it completely backwards – this being a thing might actually unlock more funds for domestic issues.

Of course it probably won't work out this way because the DoD doesn't just say "We bought a bunch of Anduril Roadrunner's instead of $4m Patriot missiles [or whatever] this year, so we don't need as much budget, take some back".

But a company trying to come up with new solutions to existing problems (you might disagree they are real problems, but we are already spending the money regardless), is actually a good thing.

Just look at SpaceX – before SpaceX, NASA had the ability to send stuff to space. But post-SpaceX, they can send more payloads at a cheaper cost. Isn't that better?

replies(1): >>38485123 #
mschuster91 ◴[] No.38485123[source]
> Just look at SpaceX – before SpaceX, NASA had the ability to send stuff to space. But post-SpaceX, they can send more payloads at a cheaper cost. Isn't that better?

They're now at the whim of an exceedingly eccentric billionaire for their space flight stuff. If Musk one day says he doesn't want to put up satellites that can be used to threaten Russia, NASA can't do anything about it, at least immediately (as they can't just rebuild their payload to fit into ULA rockets). We've already seen that play out with Starlink.

The world pre-SpaceX wasn't good either as NASA was mostly (ab)used by Congress to distribute pork, but now I think the pendulum has swung to the other side way too far - now Congress has zero control short of emergency nationalization over SpaceX.

replies(4): >>38485231 #>>38487310 #>>38497272 #>>38536847 #
1. inemesitaffia ◴[] No.38536847[source]
Whoever pays the piper calls the tune. When you refuse to pay you end up getting what you paid for.