←back to thread

186 points drak0n1c | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
remarkEon ◴[] No.38483714[source]
So the emergency services use-cases seem obvious and straightforward, but rare. Can't be that big of a market for that, at least for repeat customers. Maybe I'm missing something, but I'd figure that those emergency services organizations would buy 2-3 and keep one in the field and the balance in inventory.

The armed HE variant, that one does not seem that straightforward to me because I don't quite see how this is better than a small missile. Is the benefit loitering? Because a larger drone can carry several armed payloads, and loiter for much longer. Is the benefit detection? Maybe that's it, given its size. Is the benefit autonomous deployment? That probably is pretty useful. Very curious who the government customer is (JSOC?).

Anyway, very cool and slick looking engineering.

Edit: Luckey with some additional comments[1]. "[I]ncreases the operator’s engagement decision space" is I think maybe the key thing here, now that I think about it. The battlefield today is saturated with sensors, so giving the operator just an extra bit of time to understand the data probably is a key innovation for drone warfare.

>Roadrunner-M's performance capacity is far superior than competing air defense solutions and is already an overmatch capability against current and emerging threats. Its employment methodology significantly increases the operator’s engagement decision space which is critically constrained with current capabilities.

>Roadrunner-M innovations include faster launch and take-off timing, three times the warhead payload capacity, ten times the one way effective range, and is three times more maneuverable in G force, compared to similar offerings on the market. A single operator can launch and supervise multiple Roadrunner or Roadrunner-M squadrons.

>Roadrunner-M can be controlled by Lattice, Anduril’s AI-powered software suite for command and control, or be fully integrated into existing air defense radars, sensors, and architectures to provide immediately deployable capability."

[1] https://x.com/PalmerLuckey/status/1730466711412052138

replies(6): >>38483770 #>>38483837 #>>38483964 #>>38483987 #>>38484129 #>>38485684 #
trevyn ◴[] No.38483770[source]
It’s a better small missile, not better than a small missile.
replies(1): >>38483783 #
nullhole ◴[] No.38483783[source]
The fact that it can land if it doesn't explode seems like a big deal. Launch a bunch at a target, first one gets blown up, rest return to base for later use.
replies(1): >>38483812 #
grogenaut ◴[] No.38483812[source]
make several at less cost because no return hardware, reduced weight or increased range, make it up in volume. Also this can break on re-use, less chance to be faulty with a factory checked item in a box
replies(3): >>38484325 #>>38484563 #>>38485531 #
1. actionfromafar ◴[] No.38484563[source]
Production cost is just one cost. Often the logistics of bringing a lot of stuff to the point of contact is much more challenging. Then it can be a very useful if you don't have to "waste" all ordnance if it misses.