←back to thread

186 points drak0n1c | 9 comments | | HN request time: 1.152s | source | bottom
1. jkachmar ◴[] No.38483742[source]
> i, personally, would not accept money from the company actively militarizing the southern US border but that's just me

food for thought, and that was even before they were advertising offensive weapons technologies of this sort.

replies(3): >>38483752 #>>38483829 #>>38484000 #
2. fastball ◴[] No.38483752[source]
What do you want the policy to be on the US southern border?
3. gantron ◴[] No.38483829[source]
Scattering sensors in the desert is militarizing the border? That’s an awfully dramatic characterization, no?
replies(1): >>38484003 #
4. silenced_trope ◴[] No.38484000[source]
Counter-point: our borders should be protected
5. mplewis ◴[] No.38484003[source]
Think for a second about what the sensors will be used to do.
replies(3): >>38484029 #>>38484049 #>>38484508 #
6. atdrummond ◴[] No.38484029{3}[source]
Prevent illegal incursions across the border? Including violent cartels, not just “migrants”?
7. gantron ◴[] No.38484049{3}[source]
I fail to see how a country maintaining awareness of passages across its borders is a bad thing.
replies(1): >>38484587 #
8. kortilla ◴[] No.38484508{3}[source]
Convert the straights into gays and the gays into straights?

No, they would be used to detect people crossing the border. What else would you use them for!?

9. ansible ◴[] No.38484587{4}[source]
Especially when it comes to smuggling drugs across the border.

Of course, we could fix the drug smuggling by decriminalizing drug addiction and treating it like other public health issues. But the "War on Drugs" still rages on, after decades of failure.