←back to thread

Massachusetts becomes fifth state to make prison calls free

(www.wgbh.org)
264 points toomuchtodo | 1 comments | 29 Nov 23 02:33 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
glenjamin ◴[29 Nov 23 12:39 UTC] No.38458643[source]▶
I once attended an internal presentation while working for the UK's Ministry of Justice.

A large number of contraband mobile phones had been confiscated, and a team performed some data analysis to see what they'd been used for.

The overwhelming conclusion was that the phones had been primarily used to keen in touch with family.

There's also a whole bunch of research that showed that maintaining ties with the outside world while incarcerated led to reduced rates of reoffending (and the inverse was also true - isolation led to increased rates).

Allowing free phone calls in and out of prisons makes a lot of sense both socially and economically.

replies(8): >>38458817 #>>38459329 #>>38459485 #>>38459854 #>>38460749 #>>38460765 #>>38471701 #>>38486522 #
up2isomorphism ◴[29 Nov 23 13:55 UTC] No.38459329[source]▶
There is no logic that a good thing should be free. In fact it should likely cost prisoners something if it is good for them. Just like breakfast is good for you but it is not free.
replies(6): >>38459349 #>>38459426 #>>38459615 #>>38459697 #>>38460114 #>>38471737 #
caboteria ◴[29 Nov 23 14:20 UTC] No.38459615[source]▶
At the same time, there's no logic that says that a good thing should cost money. A walk in the woods is good for you, should we charge for that?
replies(2): >>38459938 #>>38460011 #
1. up2isomorphism ◴[29 Nov 23 14:50 UTC] No.38460011{3}[source]▶
Also in your particular example, if you walking in a woods that is private or requires hiring people to maintain, you will likely need to pay it. You don’t need to pay it if you walk in the wilderness, but even that you still indirectly paying it via tax if there are any work needs to be done to keep the wilderness looks good to you.