←back to thread

388 points replyifuagree | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nabla9 ◴[] No.37965582[source]
My estimate math:

R = t × [1.1^ln(n+p) + 1.3^X]

R - time it really takes.

t - shortest possible time it would take without need to communicate.

n - number of people working and involved during the process, both customers and developing organization.

p - longest communication distance network involved in the project (typically from the lowest level developer to the end user)

X - number of new tools, libraries, techniques, used in the process.

Example. Project involving one developing writing code. Project would take 2 weeks (t=2), but it has 5 people (n=5) involved total, only 1 new tool (X=1) and longest communication distance is 4.

2×(1.1^ln(5+4) + 1.3^1) = 4.5 weeks.

replies(3): >>37965587 #>>37965635 #>>37966239 #
sokoloff ◴[] No.37966239[source]
Why does zero new tools (X) add time?

Alternatively, why does one new tool add so little time?

replies(1): >>37970607 #
1. ◴[] No.37970607[source]