←back to thread

The midwit home

(dynomight.substack.com)
416 points stacktrust | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.004s | source
Show context
imiric ◴[] No.37860901[source]
> Hauling your body across the room just to flip a switch is absurd.

Maybe this is a sign of getting old, but I never got why this is such a hassle. Light switches are within reach when you enter a room. Once you're inside, you rarely have to touch them again until you exit. On the rare ocasion that I do, maybe it's also a good time to stretch my legs, take a bathroom break, or get a snack.

Is that such a major inconvenience that we have to overengineer solutions using expensive and complicated ecosystems of gadgets and software?

Maybe I'm in the minority with this line of thinking on this forum, but I never got the smart home appeal. I want devices that I can control directly, not those that will interpret or anticipate what I want to do and, more than likely, cause frustration rather than satisfaction. The switch is the ubiquitous and perfect mechanism of control, especially if it's directly wired to a simple state machine, and not layers of indirection and "protocols". I wish more devices used dumb switches, not less.

Don't get me started on the motion sensing lights TFA mentions. I curse the times I've entered a public bathroom that has these, only for the light to go off at the most inopportune moment. Don't want to use a physical switch because of sanitation? That's fine, but cheap and low-power LED lights exist for them to be always on during your service hours. You won't save much having the light turn off, and potentially annoy your customers.

replies(9): >>37860999 #>>37861072 #>>37861341 #>>37861417 #>>37861639 #>>37861997 #>>37862168 #>>37862523 #>>37866524 #
1. modeless ◴[] No.37866524[source]
I thought this until my parents bought an expensive and fancy house. There are dozens of light switches spread all over the walls of the large living areas plus individual lamps and it's a chore to walk around and switch them all off every night or when you leave the house. I can see why automation is attractive for that, and I can see why home automation companies would target owners of fancy houses since they have the most money.

I blame the designers though. The fine grained control is completely unnecessary. If each room had only one circuit for all the lights in the room, controlled by switches at each doorway, that would also fix the problem.

replies(1): >>37868403 #
2. imiric ◴[] No.37868403[source]
Sure, I can see how automation would be useful in that case. If it ever becomes a problem I need to solve, I'll consider fancy gadgets to help me, but jumping into a complex solution to a nonexistent problem doesn't make sense to me.

I reckon that most of these deployments are done because the owner is a tech geek and enjoys tinkering, and not because of necessity. Which is fine as well, whatever floats your boat.