←back to thread

417 points mkmk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
sakex ◴[] No.37602311[source]
Let's say you live in front of the Splunk office, and you see tens of people in suits, a limo with a CISCO sticker, as well as a lot of commotion on the office in front of you. You strongly suspect something is happening, you buy $22k of Splunk calls.

Is that insider trading?

replies(7): >>37602338 #>>37603186 #>>37604277 #>>37606267 #>>37607724 #>>37608700 #>>37608735 #
ar_lan ◴[] No.37602338[source]
Disclaimer: not financial advice

I don't think so, it happened publicly, you weren't privvy to classified details. I would go for it if I were in that scenario.

replies(1): >>37602538 #
sakex ◴[] No.37602538[source]
If it's legal, it means that somebody could write a model that could predict mergers pretty accurately and make a lot of money. For instance, by tracking flight patterns of C-suites executives, scanning car brands in parkings next to offices using satellite images, and analysing working hours of the staff (this can be done in multiple ways like sending e-mails to check of automated OOO responses or analysing the light coming out of the building from satellite images.)
replies(6): >>37602610 #>>37602651 #>>37602684 #>>37602764 #>>37602889 #>>37604878 #
1. tqi ◴[] No.37602684[source]
A version of this is already happening: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/05/stock-v...