←back to thread

Hacker News Guidelines

(news.ycombinator.com)
446 points tonmoy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.212s | source
Show context
ateng ◴[] No.37251404[source]
The world of internet would be a _much_ better place if everyone at least have read this. I tried my best to adhere to these rules in any social network.
replies(2): >>37252484 #>>37253136 #
roflyear ◴[] No.37253136[source]
It is unfortunate that the rules are so vague/up for interpretation, and when you break them, it isn't explained to you that you broke them. The rule just gets cited and there you go.
replies(3): >>37254572 #>>37256466 #>>37258432 #
kelnos ◴[] No.37254572[source]
I've found that dang is very open to discussion about these sorts of things. He's only an email away, and usually responds quickly.
replies(2): >>37256071 #>>37256775 #
lazyasciiart ◴[] No.37256071[source]
I've found the complete opposite: it took years to even get a dismissive response, and longer to get him to actually bother looking into what I wrote. Depends whether you pass his initial guess at whether you have a real issue or are trolling him, apparently.
replies(3): >>37256402 #>>37257880 #>>37258416 #
dang ◴[] No.37257880[source]
I'd be interested in what took years—can you explain? My worst case in terms of responding to emails is a few months—which is terrible, but happens when (a) the inbox is backed up and (b) the request requires more than a little time.

It doesn't really depend on whether I think someone's trolling, because the response is usually much the same in either case and anyhow genuine trolling (i.e. totally bad-faith action to provoke or waste time) is relatively rare.

replies(2): >>37260455 #>>37291718 #
1. lapcat ◴[] No.37260455[source]
I find it very odd that a 16 year old web service with user accounts has no method of contacting the moderators other than email.

I have no desire to take HN "offline" and pollute my inbox/outbox with a bunch of moderation notes. That's too annoying.

It might be slightly better if every submission and comment had a mailto: that automatically populated a new email with a link, but even then, this shouldn't be necessary.