←back to thread

Hacker News Guidelines

(news.ycombinator.com)
446 points tonmoy | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
ajonit ◴[] No.37251548[source]
While you are there, go through dang’s comments timeline https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=dang

Moderating something like HN is a very hard job. Gratitude .

replies(6): >>37251842 #>>37251867 #>>37252306 #>>37252395 #>>37252751 #>>37258905 #
bowsamic ◴[] No.37251867[source]
I understand why but I don’t like how people are individually rate limited silently without their knowledge. It is certainly immoral

EDIT: unfortunately I cannot defend my point in the comments, as I am now rate limited :)

EDIT 2: /u/Dylan16807 yes I'm seeing that. When I try and post it says "you are posting too quickly, please slow down"

replies(7): >>37251921 #>>37252401 #>>37252411 #>>37252420 #>>37252937 #>>37255441 #>>37256087 #
whimsicalism ◴[] No.37251921[source]
When I was rate-limited, I found it quite easy to find out what happened after a little bit of googling and get it reversed with a nicely worded email. It doesn't take a genius to figure out why you can't really post after a reply from dang.

Nonetheless, I agree they could be a bit more explicit about this.

replies(1): >>37252026 #
bowsamic ◴[] No.37252026[source]
> It doesn't take a genius to figure out why you can't really post after a reply from dang.

Well actually it does because you're wrong about this, it isn't about him replying to you, he manually sets a flag on your account.

replies(1): >>37252081 #
whimsicalism ◴[] No.37252081[source]
> Well actually it does because you're wrong about this, it isn't about him replying to you, he manually sets a flag on your account.

Right, but in my experience, this usually occurs after a reply.

replies(2): >>37252319 #>>37252410 #
bowsamic ◴[] No.37252319[source]
You said it doesn't take a genius to work it out but you haven't worked it out. It's opaque other than that we know it's a flag that can be manually set on the user without their knowledge
replies(1): >>37252359 #
1. whimsicalism ◴[] No.37252359[source]
I worked out that I had been flagged. I was not saying that dang replying was the mechanism, you are just (intentionally?) misinterpreting what I am saying. That dang replies to you is an indicator that he has flagged you.

Not going to keep replying, as I suspect that a conversation between two people flagged in this manner is one of the likeliest to turn flame-y :)