←back to thread

433 points Sporktacular | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mkatx ◴[] No.36994570[source]
Steam gets all my gaming budget, as I really try to stick to Linux.

If it ain't on steam, I don't play it, and they don't get my money.

replies(5): >>36994692 #>>36995317 #>>36996027 #>>36997279 #>>36997894 #
Daz1 ◴[] No.36995317[source]
How does it feel to rent your games from Valve?
replies(7): >>36995364 #>>36995367 #>>36995682 #>>36997475 #>>36997961 #>>36999091 #>>37016588 #
deaddodo ◴[] No.36995682[source]
I prefer it to renting from Nintendo, Sony, Microsoft, Epic and Ubisoft.

And prefer not having to haul a library of physical media with me everywhere at the minuscule risk of losing access to said games.

replies(1): >>36995827 #
johnnyanmac ◴[] No.36995827[source]
weird you are fine with Steam, but Epic has the exact same format and it's a problem.
replies(3): >>36996117 #>>36997115 #>>36998305 #
aniforprez ◴[] No.36996117[source]
The Epic launcher is an unmitigated disaster that has barely improved in library management capabilities since it launched. I'm not sure if they fixed it but last I used it you literally could not see the download size of the game you're downloading and the controls for changing the queues are non-existent. The launcher is also the biggest resource hog of them all beating Origin and UPlay which is an achievement in itself. I am not wading through how troublesome it is to use what should be a fairly well featured launcher after 4 years of launch to support a "competitor". Discoverability on the store is also awful when Steam has been working on this space for over a decade to try and highlight indies. The reviews system is also incredibly inferior.

If I have to use some third party launcher to make up for what it lacks, I might as well use steam

replies(4): >>36996202 #>>36996250 #>>36998729 #>>37000905 #
1. pram ◴[] No.37000905[source]
They also took years to add a shopping cart.