←back to thread

322 points atomroflbomber | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.452s | source
1. flobosg ◴[] No.36990769[source]
Martin Shkreli (yes, that Martin Shkreli) is currently running a virtual screen for additional PCNA inhibitors: https://twitter.com/wagieeacc/status/1687137621699436552
replies(2): >>36993213 #>>36995268 #
2. soVeryTired ◴[] No.36993213[source]
Can you explain what's going on there? Sounds like he's doing something to prevent patenting of drugs but I don't follow what it is.
replies(1): >>36995834 #
3. adamredwoods ◴[] No.36995268[source]
His history is not good.

>> Shkreli bought the exclusive rights to manufacture Daraprim, a drug that can treat a rare parasitic disease, in 2015 and hiked the price from $13.50 per pill to $750, to much controversy. The entrepreneur was ordered in January 2022 to return $64.6 million in profit made by the price hikes and creating what the Federal Trade Commission alleged was “a web of anti-competitive restrictions” to prevent rivals from making a cheaper generic version.

https://www.fastcompany.com/90932968/martin-shkreli-dr-gupta...

replies(1): >>36999381 #
4. flobosg ◴[] No.36995834[source]
Virtual screening[1] is a computational technique where you take an experimentally resolved structure of a protein (PCNA in this case) and sequentially dock a large amount of different compounds to see which ones of them bind favorably to the target protein. It is worth mentioning that virtual screening is a very early step in a drug discovery pipeline. These hits need to be characterized and validated experimentally to see if there is an actual effect.

I am not well-versed in intellectual property (so please correct me if I’m wrong), but in this case Shkreli is using a database of commercially available compounds (ZINC) and a hit present in the screen could be patented. He said he won’t do it, and, since this could be considered prior art, nobody else can do a claim.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_screening

5. caeril ◴[] No.36999381[source]
His history is "fine", if you consider that this is par for the course for the pharma industry. Acquiring IP rights to a drug, then ratcheting the price is a tale as old as time.

Shkreli's main sin is choosing a drug that is primarily used by a specific protected class. It treats parasitic infections that normally don't take hold in people with healthy immune response. Daraprim's customer list is something like 92% AIDS patients, and 8% immuno-compromised for other reasons.

Shkreli did something that happens all the time, and we don't bat an eye. But you don't do it to protected classes without a mob response.