←back to thread

322 points atomroflbomber | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.265s | source
Show context
lelag ◴[] No.36983601[source]
If 2023 ends up giving us AGI, room-temperature superconductors, Starships and a cure for cancer, I think we will able to call it a good year...
replies(10): >>36983623 #>>36984116 #>>36984118 #>>36984549 #>>36986942 #>>36987008 #>>36987250 #>>36987546 #>>36987577 #>>36992261 #
azinman2 ◴[] No.36986942[source]
We’re not getting AGI anytime soon…
replies(6): >>36987177 #>>36987360 #>>36987472 #>>36987477 #>>36987541 #>>36987759 #
AbrahamParangi ◴[] No.36987177[source]
What exactly is your definition of a AGI? Because we’re already passing the Turing test, and so I have to wonder if this isn’t just moving the goalposts.
replies(5): >>36987466 #>>36987583 #>>36988222 #>>36988633 #>>36989206 #
shrimpx ◴[] No.36989206[source]
How do you pass the Turing test with “As an AI, I don’t have opinions and I don’t know shit after September 2021”

The idea that GPT4 passed the Turing test is preposterous unless the test is a much more restricted version of what I think it is — in which case it would be meaningless.

replies(1): >>36990657 #
1. jimmySixDOF ◴[] No.36990657[source]
GPT4 can pass the Turing Test! The Turing test line has been crossed more times than most Popes some would say the Eliza Effect fooled people enough in the 60s to count. No comment on the AGI claim you are responding to - but them putting GPT4 in a septic bubble suit is not relevant.