←back to thread

Watch TV from the 90s and earlier

(my90stv.com)
653 points thunderbong | 7 comments | 28 Jul 23 12:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.939s | source | bottom
Show context
gdubs ◴[28 Jul 23 20:14 UTC] No.36912672[source]▶
Omg, this is amazing. I just got completely engrossed in a John Stewart interview of Conan from like, '94.

One thing I realized about TikTok is how much it taps into the channel-flipping mechanism. It's basically what I would do as a kid rotating the dial, giving each beat about a second or two before flipping to the next.

The biggest difference is that today, it never comes back around the dial - the dial is practically infinite.

replies(4): >>36913190 #>>36913947 #>>36914194 #>>36918931 #
1. rudyfink ◴[28 Jul 23 20:55 UTC] No.36913190[source]▶
>The biggest difference is that today, it never comes back around the dial - the dial is practically infinite.

And the TV analyzes your dial-flipping to determine what channel to change you to / generates a channel you are more likely to stay on.

replies(3): >>36913301 #>>36913508 #>>36913611 #
2. mnd999 ◴[28 Jul 23 21:04 UTC] No.36913301[source]▶
Heh, heh, this sux change it.
3. jvm___ ◴[28 Jul 23 21:21 UTC] No.36913508[source]▶
Is hackernews on of the last sites where the TV doesn't analyze your preferences and generates a new front-page based on what it thinks will engage you the most?
replies(2): >>36915565 #>>36916102 #
4. joahua ◴[28 Jul 23 21:28 UTC] No.36913611[source]▶
To be fair TV ratings did this, just on a very slow inference cycle!
replies(1): >>36918940 #
5. xattt ◴[29 Jul 23 00:51 UTC] No.36915565[source]▶
Hacker News is interactive Teletext.
6. not2b ◴[29 Jul 23 02:09 UTC] No.36916102[source]▶
No, Mastodon is the same. You get what you follow, people or hashtags, plus things the people you follow boost.
7. Sakos ◴[29 Jul 23 10:55 UTC] No.36918940[source]▶
TV ratings did this as an aggregate of estimated viewer preferences. Doing that immediately on an individual level is wholly different.