←back to thread

Watch TV from the 90s and earlier

(my90stv.com)
653 points thunderbong | 1 comments | 28 Jul 23 12:46 UTC | HN request time: 0.331s | source
Show context
boomboomsubban ◴[28 Jul 23 15:57 UTC] No.36908788[source]▶
I'm surprised there aren't more full tapings of 90's television available, as in entire blocks of broadcasting with all the commercials intact. That was how most recording would have happened, and with the start of TV Land the networks should have been able to predict there'd be a market for it in 30 years.
replies(5): >>36908845 #>>36908922 #>>36912076 #>>36914980 #>>36915509 #
guestbest ◴[28 Jul 23 16:04 UTC] No.36908922[source]▶
Storage was a problem back then.
replies(1): >>36909338 #
boomboomsubban ◴[28 Jul 23 16:29 UTC] No.36909338[source]▶
Not really. Hoarders were already mass recording TV from home, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_Stokes

Recording ~5 hours of television a night would have been a trivial cost for a network like NBC. Particularly compared to the licensing fees those hours would have had.

replies(5): >>36909796 #>>36910516 #>>36910624 #>>36911425 #>>36912036 #
1. karaterobot ◴[28 Jul 23 18:49 UTC] No.36911425[source]▶
Presumably it's not just the cost of storage media, but storage of the media too. Climate-controlled warehouses leased in perpetuity, archivists, security, and so on. To be clear, I don't think this is why so much of TV and movies (not to mention radio) is lost, I think that's just lack of foresight or different priorities. My point is, I don't think just buying a few thousand off-the-shelf VHS blanks would have solved the problem.