←back to thread

756 points dagurp | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
dang ◴[] No.36882654[source]
I think these are the related threads to date—have I missed any?

Google is already pushing WEI into Chromium - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36876301 - July 2023 (705 comments)

Google engineers want to make ad-blocking (near) impossible - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36875226 - July 2023 (439 comments)

Google vs. the Open Web - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36875164 - July 2023 (161 comments)

Apple already shipped attestation on the web, and we barely noticed - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36862494 - July 2023 (413 comments)

Google’s nightmare “Web Integrity API” wants a DRM gatekeeper for the web - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36854114 - July 2023 (447 comments)

Web Environment Integrity API Proposal - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36817305 - July 2023 (437 comments)

Web Environment Integrity Explainer - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36785516 - July 2023 (44 comments)

Google Chrome Proposal – Web Environment Integrity - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36778999 - July 2023 (93 comments)

Web Environment Integrity – Google locking down on browsers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35864471 - May 2023 (1 comment)

replies(2): >>36882774 #>>36887578 #
1. benatkin ◴[] No.36882774[source]
I had one but it got flagged, ah well:

- “I don't know why this enrages folks so much.” Googler re Chrome anti-feature https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36868888

I think that just meant some users with sufficient karma flagged it, but I was a bit confused because for a while it didn't say "[flagged]" but didn't show up in the first several pages or continue to get upvotes. Is there a delay in saying "[flagged]"?

replies(1): >>36883224 #
2. dang ◴[] No.36883224[source]
The [flagged] marker only shows up after flags exceed a certain threshold, but flags can affect a post's ranking before that.
replies(1): >>36885738 #
3. nubinetwork ◴[] No.36885738[source]
It says dead now?
replies(1): >>36885876 #
4. dang ◴[] No.36885876{3}[source]
No doubt it got flagged over the threshold. I've unkilled it now.