←back to thread

596 points pimterry | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
freedomben ◴[] No.36863801[source]
> That said, it's not as dangerous as the Google proposal, simply because Safari isn't the dominant browser. Right now, Safari has around 20% market share in browsers (25% on mobile, and 15% on desktop), while Chrome is comfortably above 60% everywhere, with Chromium more generally (Brave, Edge, Opera, Samsung Internet, etc) about 10% above that.

I don't agree, in fact I think it's equally as bad for Apple to do it as Google. Apple has completely let us down. If Google forced it through but Apple refused, it would never be practical to enforce it. The numbers may not be as high, but they're plenty high enough that you couldn't cut all iDevices out. Apple and Google and Microsoft are the only three that really matter.

replies(3): >>36865260 #>>36865703 #>>36865938 #
1. supriyo-biswas ◴[] No.36865703[source]
Apple has PATs though, which could serve as a replacement for WEI.