←back to thread

596 points pimterry | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.225s | source
Show context
gooob ◴[] No.36862804[source]
what even is the reasoning they have for proposing and implementing this?
replies(3): >>36862852 #>>36862893 #>>36862910 #
ezfe ◴[] No.36862910[source]
Allow Apple devices to browse the web with fewer captcha interruptions, etc. and be more trusted as non-bot devices.
replies(1): >>36863657 #
FabHK ◴[] No.36863657[source]
> Allow Apple devices to browse the web with fewer captcha interruptions

In particular, while using a VPN or Tor. So in one sense it’s even a pro-privacy move, insofar as it allows to distinguish a human user on a legit device using a VPN from a bot using a VPN (upon which the server can present a captcha or denial to the latter, but not the former, making it less onerous for average users to use a VPN).

replies(2): >>36864231 #>>36864276 #
1. freedomben ◴[] No.36864276[source]
It's only a pro-privacy move if you completely trust Apple (the mandatory 3rd party approver) both now and in the future to be pro-privacy. The minute their growth slows and the shareholders demand changes, the pro-privacy can go out the window, and they've got the advertisers wet dream ready and waiting, reserved exclusively for them. Corporations are profit-seeking entities by design, and leadership who doesn't act in the best interest of the shareholders (i.e. profit seekers) will be removed and replaced by leadership who does.