←back to thread

797 points burnerbob | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.601s | source
Show context
tptacek ◴[] No.36810326[source]
Y'all, this is going to be deeply unsatisfying, but it's what I can report personally:

I have no earthly clue why this thread on our community site is unlisted.

We're looking at the admin UI for it right now, and there's like, a little lock next to do the story, but the "unlist story" option is still there for us to click. The best I can say is: I'm reasonably sure there wasn't some top-down edict to hide this thread (the site is public, anybody can sign up for an account and see the thread).

Say what you want about us, but hiding out from stuff like this isn't one of our flaws. When I find out more about what happened with this thread, I'll let you know (or Kurt will reply here and tell me I'm wrong).

I don't know enough about what happened with this Sydney server to be helpful to people who had instances running on it. When I know more about it, I'll be helpful, but I'm just learning about this stuff right now, after getting back in from a night out.

Almost immediately afterwards

It looks like... all the posts in the app-not-working category are "private"? Like it's some setting on the category itself? "Private" here means you need to have signed up for a Discourse account to see them?

replies(12): >>36810339 #>>36810345 #>>36810393 #>>36810467 #>>36810497 #>>36810498 #>>36810755 #>>36810983 #>>36812367 #>>36812723 #>>36812856 #>>36834726 #
marcinzm ◴[] No.36812856[source]
Honest advice, probably to Kurt rather than you, is you need better processes, accountability and (probably) communication in your company. The tone of your reply (and other communications from fly.io) is reflective of the lack of those things given the public sentiment regarding fly.io. At 60+ employees and so many issues that tone goes from humanly endearing to indicative of a non-scaling business. Other replies indicate you don't want the things (process, oversight, etc.) that a growing B2B business needs to really succeed which is not a good sign. Sure there's a cost to that corporate-ness and you want to minimize that cost but it's also a necessary evil for the business you're in at the scale you're at.

If something breaks once it's an accident, if it breaks twice it's bad luck but if it breaks down three times it's broken processes. Based on the comment here things break at fly.io a lot more often than three times.

replies(2): >>36814258 #>>36820707 #
tptacek ◴[] No.36814258[source]
I'm just a person on Hacker News that happens to be at Fly.io; as I've said before, it's probably reasonable to think of me as an HN person first, and a Fly.io person second. My tone is my tone, and has been for the many years I've participated in this community. I got back from an evening out, saw that we were on the front page, poked around a little to find out what the hell was going on, and did my best to add some context. That's all.

If you're reading my comments on HN as some kind of official response from the company, you've misconstrued them.

replies(3): >>36814552 #>>36815698 #>>36816713 #
1. marcinzm ◴[] No.36816713[source]
It seems you took my comment personally but it was about not just your comments but the overall tone of the fly.io communication (see recent blog post regarding funding) and approach to issues (three days of silence on a dead instance). You view processes and guidelines as chains versus as a ladder to help you climb a cliff. If the processes and communication was good then you'd know when you should self-restrict and when you shouldn't. You'd be empowered to make decisions within a framework that benefits fly.io the most versus being left to guess yourself. You'd understand why you should do that sometimes and why it's a better option for everyone.
replies(1): >>36816754 #
2. tptacek ◴[] No.36816754[source]
I don't, but that's fine: it's not important that we understand each other all that clearly here, since all I'm talking about is how our public forum works.