←back to thread

797 points burnerbob | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
aledalgrande ◴[] No.36809594[source]
Wondering if for small/bootstrapped projects there's any alternative people suggest? Fly has a nice UX and accessible prices, but it's unstable at best. I use the big clouds at work, but for personal they are $$$. Also I want to keep devops tending asymptotically to zero.
replies(6): >>36809634 #>>36809757 #>>36809923 #>>36809986 #>>36810231 #>>36817346 #
gowthamgts12 ◴[] No.36809634[source]
Although, i have never used them, you can explore railway.app. it is the closest to fly.io and never heard any bad things.

I personally at the moment use digitalocean without any issues, but there's always the maintenance overhead of managing a server yourself.

replies(2): >>36809768 #>>36812801 #
Fire-Dragon-DoL ◴[] No.36809768[source]
I wish digitalocean offered decent pricing for spaces (s3). Unfortunately it starts at 5$, which is an enormous price for storing 70 small images, but s3 would greatly simplify my server management moving state entirely outside the server (managed database + managed object storage)
replies(2): >>36809782 #>>36809841 #
bongobingo1 ◴[] No.36809782[source]
> price for storing 70 small images

Do you have to use an object store in that case? Or does it have to be separate from whatever application instance?

replies(1): >>36810063 #
Fire-Dragon-DoL ◴[] No.36810063[source]
I don't have to use an object store, but it makes the cost of setting up a server more expensive if I use the filesystem, if I delete the instance, the data is gone. A volume kinda offset this, but it's way less portable and accessible only by one instance at a time

The peace of mind of managed is nice, all I have to think about is running the app, without having to deal with making sure db and files don't get lost

replies(1): >>36810481 #
Dylan16807 ◴[] No.36810481[source]
At that level I think I'd just put the images in the database.
replies(2): >>36811948 #>>36821661 #
1. Takennickname ◴[] No.36811948{5}[source]
In the git repo even
replies(1): >>36821651 #
2. Fire-Dragon-DoL ◴[] No.36821651[source]
The images are supplied by the users, so that wouldn't be an option