←back to thread

2039 points Gadiguibou | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.219s | source
Show context
klausa ◴[] No.36491947[source]
`pbcopy` and `pbpaste` are one of my most-loved in the list.

Dealing with some minified json, switching to iTerm, doing `pbpaste | json_pp | pbcopy` and having a clean output is _so_ nice.

replies(28): >>36492008 #>>36492015 #>>36492028 #>>36492101 #>>36492108 #>>36492229 #>>36492265 #>>36492890 #>>36492953 #>>36493037 #>>36493127 #>>36493336 #>>36493457 #>>36493802 #>>36494023 #>>36494242 #>>36494325 #>>36495379 #>>36495894 #>>36496866 #>>36497033 #>>36497293 #>>36497589 #>>36497973 #>>36498181 #>>36498558 #>>36498586 #>>36535798 #
omginternets ◴[] No.36492265[source]
If I had a nickel for each `cat foo.json | jq | pbcopy`, I'd be a rich man :)
replies(1): >>36492862 #
maleldil ◴[] No.36492862[source]
That's a useless use of cat. You can use `jq . foo.json | pbcopy` or `jq < foo.json | pbcopy`.
replies(6): >>36492960 #>>36493144 #>>36493370 #>>36494558 #>>36495101 #>>36495918 #
jdbartee ◴[] No.36492960[source]
Speaking for myself, the first form is more natural- even if it’s a useless cat, because I’m always cat-ing files to see their structure. Then progressively tacking on different transforms. And then finally putting it in whatever I want as output.

It’s so ingrained, I’m more likely than not to just write it out that way even when I know exactly what I’m doing from the onset.

replies(5): >>36493350 #>>36493487 #>>36494377 #>>36496238 #>>36497947 #
1. paulddraper ◴[] No.36493350[source]
You could consider

    < foo.json jq | pbcopy