←back to thread

752 points dceddia | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
NovemberWhiskey ◴[] No.36447461[source]
Some additional things to note:

Windows NT 3.51 minimum hardware requirements were a i386 or i486 processor at 25MHz or better and 12MB of RAM for the workstation version. So the 600MHz machine with 128MB RAM is exceeding the minimum requirement by (conservatively) 24x in CPU speed and 10x in RAM, along with all the architectural improvements from going from the i386 to what's presumably a Pentium III-class machine.

If that's actually a Surface Go 2 running Windows 11 - well, it doesn't have a quad-core i5 as the tweet claims - the Surface Go 2 came with a Pentium Gold or a Core m3; both with only two cores and of those is an ultra-low power variant.

As such, that exactly meets the minimum CPU specification for Windows 11 and only doubles the minimum 4GB RAM requirement.

I'm not trying to apologize for the difference here, but it's not an entirely like-for-like comparison.

replies(15): >>36447608 #>>36447610 #>>36447680 #>>36447745 #>>36447813 #>>36447953 #>>36448077 #>>36448345 #>>36448687 #>>36448693 #>>36449563 #>>36449787 #>>36450832 #>>36452031 #>>36456701 #
1. dijit ◴[] No.36456701[source]
By that logic: Windows 10 on my Threadripper 3970x with 256G of RAM should be comparably fast to Windows NT as presented.

Since the aggregate GHz and RAM on offer is more than 25x the minimum spec for windows 10.

Win10 min spec is 1GHz w/ 2GB of RAM - my machine is more than one hundred times faster, yet, everything TFA says is true.