←back to thread

OpenGL 3.1 on Asahi Linux

(asahilinux.org)
512 points simjue | 4 comments | 06 Jun 23 13:46 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nightski ◴[06 Jun 23 14:20 UTC] No.36213208[source]▶
This is great work and I commend it. But in other threads people are acting like Asahi Linux hardware support is 100% complete. My fear is that if I were to go this route and purchase the hardware I'd be seeing fraction of the performance and capability I would in Mac OS. To be honest this blog post seems like the project has a long ways to go, not that it is nearly completion.

I just can't justify buying hardware from a company that is so hostile to developers and hackers as nice as it may be.

replies(9): >>36213287 #>>36213309 #>>36213359 #>>36213764 #>>36213841 #>>36214046 #>>36214150 #>>36214656 #>>36221582 #
rollcat ◴[06 Jun 23 14:25 UTC] No.36213287[source]▶
> I just can't justify buying hardware from a company that is so hostile to developers and hackers as nice as it may be.

I don't think it's hostile, I think they're just hands-off; they throw the hardware over the fence and say, "if you wanna make use of it, here's our software; if you don't like our software, sorry no docs but you're free to write your own". Which is exactly what's happening.

I mean it would be nice if Apple had released more documentation, but I totally understand if they don't want the burden of supporting it.

replies(2): >>36213379 #>>36213579 #
1. smoldesu ◴[06 Jun 23 14:30 UTC] No.36213379[source]▶
There's a line somewhere, and I think it's different for every person. For a lot of people, the pricing itself is just outright hostile. 8gb of RAM in a base model Mac is not future-proofed in an age of local AI models, and paying to upgrade it gets expensive, fast. For others the OS is hostile when it unceremoniously drops support for $THING they use, or because it has the gall to show them ads. For others yet, the hardware is hostile because it's basically a black box that Apple withholds documenting to maintain a monopoly on fixing them.

Apple is one of the few companies smart enough to deliberately do this. It is both a testament to ability to do brilliant things, and akin to being trapped in a room with a lion that has twice your SAT score. The "golden handcuffs", as they say.

replies(3): >>36213795 #>>36214200 #>>36223965 #
2. kytazo ◴[06 Jun 23 14:56 UTC] No.36213795[source]▶
Well overall if you sum up what even a basic m1 mb air packs, be it the panel, quality peripherals and soc itself its rather reasonable and within reach for almost anyone contemplating of buying a new computer. When you factor in that they were the first ones with an actual capable desktop arm offer I'd even say its cheap.

At least this is how I felt 2 years ago back when I bought it and more or less even to this day. I'm wondering how is the market as of now, two years later, and how the $1k arm laptops coming out today compare.

3. kaba0 ◴[06 Jun 23 15:19 UTC] No.36214200[source]▶
There is literally no other laptop on the market that would be anywhere close to an M1 air in terms of performance-battery life combo. And it is definitely not even on the upper end in price for that, tiny windows laptops are ridiculously expensive!

So, are they really expensive?

4. amon22 ◴[07 Jun 23 07:32 UTC] No.36223965[source]▶
Macbooks are really cheap for what they are, not sure what are you on friend. I would never buy one though, still, they are very impressive and its a shame that they are not free.