←back to thread

414 points muchtest | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nkurz ◴[] No.35929865[source]
Vouched for and upvoted because I think it's important for readers here to see how much effort goes into creating posts that game the system. I think it's better for these strategies to be known than hidden. It will be interesting to see how tactics like this one evolve as ChatGPT use becomes more widespread.

There's a definite tension between the rule of not accusing other users of being shills and the reality that there are quite a few shills out there. I think it a still good rule, but not because it's never right. Rather, the rule is good because the false accusations do more harm than letting some shilling slip by.

replies(7): >>35930145 #>>35930992 #>>35932488 #>>35933481 #>>35934251 #>>35934959 #>>35935998 #
bombcar ◴[] No.35930145[source]
There’s a silent part of that rule: if you suspect a shill, gather the evidence and present it to dang via email.
replies(1): >>35932358 #
dang ◴[] No.35932358[source]
Yes please.

Edit: actually not so silent - it's the latter part of this guideline from https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html: "Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email hn@ycombinator.com and we'll look at the data."

It's part of the contract we have with HN users - we ask them not to post this stuff in the threads, but in return we always look into cases that they report to us directly.

replies(1): >>35933443 #
marketingLizard ◴[] No.35933443[source]
How long do shill posts last before they've been taken care of?
replies(3): >>35933686 #>>35934237 #>>35934559 #
burnished ◴[] No.35933686[source]
Just out of curiosity, what sort of answer are you expecting? Your post reads as vaguely accusatory to me - like you're implying that messes are being left intentionally
replies(2): >>35933792 #>>35933910 #
1. svnt ◴[] No.35933792[source]
Accounting for their username they are either making a joke or trying to assess the potential performance of the strategy even if they get flagged.