←back to thread

414 points muchtest | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
nkurz ◴[] No.35929865[source]
Vouched for and upvoted because I think it's important for readers here to see how much effort goes into creating posts that game the system. I think it's better for these strategies to be known than hidden. It will be interesting to see how tactics like this one evolve as ChatGPT use becomes more widespread.

There's a definite tension between the rule of not accusing other users of being shills and the reality that there are quite a few shills out there. I think it a still good rule, but not because it's never right. Rather, the rule is good because the false accusations do more harm than letting some shilling slip by.

replies(7): >>35930145 #>>35930992 #>>35932488 #>>35933481 #>>35934251 #>>35934959 #>>35935998 #
ouid ◴[] No.35932488[source]
the rule against calling other people shills is the worst part of hackernews. Skepticism is important, and important to share. I have never been anything but grateful to read a comment pointing out that another comment was obviously a shill. Perhaps I have been embarrassed for not seeing the obvious truth, but always grateful.
replies(5): >>35932531 #>>35932559 #>>35932747 #>>35932851 #>>35934150 #
1. Kiro ◴[] No.35932559[source]
I would bet 99% of the "obvious shills" are actually not shills at all.
replies(1): >>35940862 #
2. dang ◴[] No.35940862[source]
Yes. In fact, probably more than that.

(long sibling comment about this - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35932851)