←back to thread

49 points 1una | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
not_your_vase ◴[] No.35928051[source]
> Yes, not every random app and feature you use on Xorg will have a Wayland equivalent. Deal with it.

In general this sentence is why the Year of Desktop Linux won't come in this millennia. Not only XOrg vs Wayland. Many such cases. Sad!

replies(8): >>35928066 #>>35928112 #>>35928157 #>>35928221 #>>35928227 #>>35928231 #>>35928305 #>>35928559 #
roenxi ◴[] No.35928559[source]
I'd go a bit further and say that is also why Wayland in particular has struggled with adoption given the lack of anyone maintaining X and the general support of maintainers for Wayland. It was a bad sign when screenshots required major architecture changes to how a linux system was expected to run.

Still, X.org is terrible and can be reasonably called the Internet Explorer 6 of the linux desktop. At least Wayland will be easier to displace if anyone comes up with something better. This is a step forward.

replies(2): >>35928632 #>>35932501 #
1. gjsman-1000 ◴[] No.35928632[source]
The Internet Explorer 6? IE6 is 17 years newer than X11.