←back to thread

49 points 1una | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.399s | source
Show context
not_your_vase ◴[] No.35928051[source]
> Yes, not every random app and feature you use on Xorg will have a Wayland equivalent. Deal with it.

In general this sentence is why the Year of Desktop Linux won't come in this millennia. Not only XOrg vs Wayland. Many such cases. Sad!

replies(8): >>35928066 #>>35928112 #>>35928157 #>>35928221 #>>35928227 #>>35928231 #>>35928305 #>>35928559 #
1. 0beef ◴[] No.35928221[source]
I think that the ability to depreciate aspects of the OS is one of GNU-Linux's greatest strengths.

For example, look how saddled MS Windows is by the burden of binary reverse-compatibility. It makes the leap to other arches like ARM nearly impossible.

Yes, some features of X11 are not present in Wayland. But the incomplete reverse-compatibility allows us to decide if those features are worth it in the first place. And if you don't like it you can patch it yourself.