←back to thread

658 points transpute | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.23s | source
Show context
fatfingerd ◴[] No.35846058[source]
The most alarming part of the article is that we are only really getting a revocation of these keys because they didn't pay a ransom and the ransomers were apparently too stupid to sell them secretly instead of releasing them to the public.

As far as we know, if MSI had paid no one would know that Intel shipped shared private keys to multiple vendors who could then lose them like drunken monkeys.

People ask why these weren't on HSMs.. The article seems to claim that they weren't even able to generate the most important ones in the correct locations, let alone on HSMs with non-extractable settings.

replies(3): >>35846584 #>>35847582 #>>35850848 #
1. ◴[] No.35846584[source]