←back to thread

658 points transpute | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Animats ◴[] No.35844753[source]
There's an upside to this. It can be used politically as an argument against backdoors for "lawful access"[1] to encrypted data.

[1] https://www.fbi.gov/about/mission/lawful-access

replies(6): >>35844809 #>>35844880 #>>35844886 #>>35845051 #>>35845431 #>>35850810 #
voidfunc ◴[] No.35844809[source]
The argument doesn't matter because the federal government and politicians don't give a shit about facts
replies(2): >>35844873 #>>35845768 #
hilbert42 ◴[] No.35844873[source]
Until their PCs get hacked and their medical and psychiatrists' notes about them become front page news.
replies(3): >>35844896 #>>35845322 #>>35845924 #
TheRealPomax ◴[] No.35844896[source]
Sorry, what? This literally happened, THIS YEAR, and not a single one cared beyond saying "oh no, this is terrible, if only there was something we could have done!"

https://apnews.com/article/congress-data-breach-hack-identit...

replies(3): >>35845131 #>>35845219 #>>35846115 #
LadyCailin ◴[] No.35845131[source]
Alternatively: Stuff is going to be leaked anyways, so we might as well also make it easy for law enforcement to do their job.
replies(2): >>35845190 #>>35846355 #
1. LadyCailin ◴[] No.35846355[source]
I was unclear in my original post, and now can’t edit it. I do not support this stance, I’m saying that this is what they might argue, given the incident the OP posted.