←back to thread

658 points transpute | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
josephcsible ◴[] No.35844339[source]
This isn't a blow to real security, just to DRM and treacherous computing. There's no legitimate security from "Secure" Boot.
replies(2): >>35844366 #>>35845021 #
bawolff ◴[] No.35844366[source]
Evil maids?
replies(6): >>35844387 #>>35844545 #>>35844816 #>>35845120 #>>35845414 #>>35849808 #
1. happymellon ◴[] No.35844545[source]
I agree that this is the reason, but having Intel as the guard only makes it so that it could have already been hacked/leaked/bypassed and you never know.

At least if it was user controlled we can ensure that other people's leaked keys don't bypass our security.

replies(1): >>35844739 #
2. charcircuit ◴[] No.35844739[source]
If it's user controlled what stops an attacker from bypassing it as the "user"? Most people just want to have a secure device and will not think about security, not want to do any work to secure their device.