←back to thread

256 points hirundo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.36s | source
Show context
Galanwe ◴[] No.35519824[source]
Can someone actually explain how IQ tests work? By work, I mean how are the tests engineered, and the results computed.

Long time ago someone explained to me that the engineering of IQ tests was actually drafted from a very large pool of (regularly updated) questions, where statistical significance was extracted to form a _core symposium_ of questions to sample from. Also, the IQ score itself was normalized to be normally distributed centered at 100.

With this understanding, I was under the impression that IQ was a relative measure, at a specific point in time, of one's placement in the distribution.

Which meant to me that IQ cannot "drop" across a population, the mean will always be 100. And IQ scores cannot be compared on a time series basis, since they are only cross sectional measures.

Is that all wrong? Is there some truth to it?

replies(7): >>35519844 #>>35520383 #>>35520430 #>>35520609 #>>35520643 #>>35520745 #>>35537495 #
1. MagicMoonlight ◴[] No.35537495[source]
It’s a hard test that doesn’t require specific knowledge and has a short time limit to prevent bruteforcing.

The questions are in difficulty order and they’re all worth the same so because of the time limit you won’t be able to answer them all correctly. The quicker you are at solving problems, the higher the score you will get.

Your score then shows how you compare to the population percentage wise and that’s your IQ. The average score would give you an average IQ.