←back to thread

256 points hirundo | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.314s | source
Show context
rahimnathwani ◴[] No.35514446[source]
This blog post asserts that IQ scores didn't drop for the population as a whole, and that the drop for each individual group is due to changing composition of that group:

https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2023/03/new-study-didnt-really-...

For example, if the % of people who do a postgraduate degree goes doubles, it's no longer such a select group, so you'd expect the average IQ of postgraduate degree holders to go down. This doesn't mean IQ scores are going down for the population as a whole.

One more thing: why do so many papers that present charts that show how a mean or median changes over time, without also presenting charts that show how the distribution has changed over time?

replies(6): >>35514708 #>>35515280 #>>35517739 #>>35518020 #>>35518556 #>>35519141 #
tptacek ◴[] No.35517739[source]
It's worth looking up whose blog this is before trusting any of its analysis.
replies(7): >>35517869 #>>35517966 #>>35518072 #>>35518112 #>>35518249 #>>35518570 #>>35518709 #
ZeroGravitas ◴[] No.35517869[source]
A summary:

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard

replies(3): >>35518284 #>>35519092 #>>35523758 #
joenot443 ◴[] No.35519092[source]
This site isn’t really any above EncyclopediaDramatica in its proximity to reality. It’s a meme pit for teenagers, not really somewhere to be taken seriously.
replies(2): >>35520607 #>>35521803 #
tomjakubowski ◴[] No.35521803[source]
The article's claims about Kirkegaard are all well cited, linking to his own comments.
replies(1): >>35523778 #
cubefox ◴[] No.35523778[source]
See https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/inaccuracies-in-rationalwikis-o...
replies(3): >>35527488 #>>35528801 #>>35530022 #
1. ◴[] No.35527488[source]