(engineering.fb.com)

392 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | 06 Apr 23 16:05 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source

Show context

jhoechtl ◴[07 Apr 23 06:48 UTC] No.35478865[source]▶

There was some initial fanfare about Sapling but it has pretty much waned. Is git simply good enough?

Shish2k ◴[07 Apr 23 13:42 UTC] No.35481478[source]▶

I’ve switched over to using Sapling as a client for my GitHub-based projects - since it’s conceptually similar, with all-round-better UX, and no changes on the server side, it has made my life better and yet I don’t really have anything to say about it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

replies(1): >>35484606 #

1. crakhamster01 ◴[07 Apr 23 17:51 UTC] No.35484606[source]▶

>>35481478 #

Just curious, but are you ex-Meta? Sapling looks pretty neat, but I was hesitant to introduce it at the company I work at since I wasn't sure if it's UX would be well-received. It feels great to me since I got used to it at Meta, but also acknowledge that others have built up the muscle for git-centric workflows.

↑

Buck2: Our open source build system