←back to thread

600 points codetrotter | 4 comments | | HN request time: 1.288s | source
Show context
subsubzero ◴[] No.35461974[source]
Congrats Dang, you have done a wonderful job so far and moderate one of the most fantastic online communities out there. I am sure most of the job feels somewhat thankless but I want to let you know I(and many many other users on this site) appreciate your hard work and dedication.
replies(3): >>35462601 #>>35462773 #>>35463700 #
codeddesign ◴[] No.35462773[source]
If by “finest” you mean a Reddit mob mentality for tech, then yes I completely agree with this statement.
replies(6): >>35462836 #>>35463131 #>>35463193 #>>35463875 #>>35464427 #>>35464999 #
dang ◴[] No.35463131[source]
What do you think we could do differently? Serious question.

I don't like the mob thing either but it's how large group dynamics on the internet work (by default). We try to mitigate it where we can but there's not a lot of knowledge about how to do that.

replies(24): >>35463179 #>>35463213 #>>35463257 #>>35463371 #>>35463548 #>>35463713 #>>35463749 #>>35464099 #>>35464410 #>>35464467 #>>35464570 #>>35464688 #>>35464754 #>>35465446 #>>35465523 #>>35465648 #>>35465794 #>>35466615 #>>35466946 #>>35467134 #>>35468675 #>>35469283 #>>35476621 #>>35488228 #
yCombLinks ◴[] No.35463213[source]
Downweight posts and comments based on the frequency and positive sentiment. IE things that are posted often and with high positive comments should bubble to the top less often.
replies(1): >>35463250 #
dang ◴[] No.35463250[source]
Other people want us to downweight negative sentiment. I wonder what happens if you downweight all the sentiments.
replies(4): >>35463297 #>>35463513 #>>35463663 #>>35476323 #
1. marklubi ◴[] No.35476323[source]
I feel that the curve needs to be adjusted to curb clickbait from trending to the top.

There are a lot of stores that trend to number 1 in under an hour that end up disappearing completely from the front page, moving near the bottom, or flagged to death, within a couple of hours because it’s just not quality content for this forum.

replies(1): >>35476906 #
2. dang ◴[] No.35476906[source]
I don't know how to do that! Wouldn't it require software that could distinguish high-quality from low-quality content?

The same bait (sensationalism, indignation) that makes many users upvote those posts is what makes other users flag them. This rise and fall has always been the pattern on HN—it's one of the cycles of life here.

replies(1): >>35478151 #
3. marklubi ◴[] No.35478151[source]
It's like throttle/pedal mapping in a car. It's about the effective curve along time/position.

Right now, it's super sensitive where a little signal does a lot right at the beginning.

Stories rocket to the top because they're new and got a number of quick votes. The curve needs to be smoothed out so that things don't lurch to the top.

Edit: I've been around here for a little while. It used to be awesome to see things jump to the top (used to have a lot lower volume of posts and users), but the audience has changed a lot, and I think things need to be adjusted a bit to slow the meteoric rise aspect. Good content will surface.

replies(1): >>35478560 #
4. marklubi ◴[] No.35478560{3}[source]
Just to provide an example of the problem. This post reached #1 with 16 upvotes and 0 comments in less than an hour.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35478120