←back to thread

Buck2: Our open source build system

(engineering.fb.com)
392 points mfiguiere | 1 comments | 06 Apr 23 16:05 UTC | HN request time: 0.318s | source
Show context
yurodivuie ◴[06 Apr 23 22:45 UTC] No.35475542[source]▶
Do smaller companies (smaller than Meta and Google) use these kinds of build tools much? It seems like a system that rebuilds everything whenever a dependency changes is more suited an environment that has very few, if any, external dependencies.

Is anyone using Buck/Bazel and also using frameworks like Spring, or React, for example?

replies(5): >>35475662 #>>35475737 #>>35475751 #>>35476098 #>>35478326 #
1. krschultz ◴[06 Apr 23 23:05 UTC] No.35475737[source]▶
I would heavily consider this type of system once build times become a major pain point. That often happens somewhere around 20-50 people working in one codebase. So I think this is a problem space for medium sized companies. Truly small companies probably don't need this and should use the standard ecosystem tools, BUT if your team knows how to use it there's little downside in started from a Buck / Bazel. Especially since you get most of the benefit if you have a nice clean DAG of your modules, and that's easy to build at the beginning and hard to refactor into later.