(aisnakeoil.substack.com)

Show context

ChancyChance ◴[21 Mar 23 13:58 UTC] No.35246181[source]▶

"10/10 pre-2021, 0/10 post-2021"

I guffawed. Hasn't there been ANY update to the Turing test since it was proposed? I suspect the answer to the benchmarking issue was address by philosophers long before we got here.

replies(2): >>35246541 #>>35248367 #

enono ◴[21 Mar 23 16:19 UTC] No.35248367[source]▶

>>35246181 #

Why is your username green?!

replies(1): >>35249917 #

schrodinger ◴[21 Mar 23 17:59 UTC] No.35249917[source]▶

>>35248367 #

New account

replies(1): >>35253224 #

1. YeGoblynQueenne ◴[21 Mar 23 22:01 UTC] No.35253224[source]▶

>>35249917 #

Yes, but why green? In particular?

replies(1): >>35256757 #

2. wrycoder ◴[22 Mar 23 04:13 UTC] No.35256757[source]▶

>>35253224 (TP) #

Greenhorn. Look it up.

replies(1): >>35258656 #

3. YeGoblynQueenne ◴[22 Mar 23 09:24 UTC] No.35258656[source]▶

>>35256757 #

Who says that's the association? Citation please.

replies(1): >>35275408 #

4. wrycoder ◴[23 Mar 23 14:31 UTC] No.35275408{3}[source]▶

>>35258656 #

LOL you’d have to ask PG, probably. But, you asked for a plausible reason behind an arbitrary choice.

What color would you choose?

replies(1): >>35277428 #

5. YeGoblynQueenne ◴[23 Mar 23 16:41 UTC] No.35277428{4}[source]▶

>>35275408 #

Green.

replies(1): >>35277941 #

6. wrycoder ◴[23 Mar 23 17:13 UTC] No.35277941{5}[source]▶

>>35277428 #

+1 !

↑

GPT-4 and professional benchmarks: the wrong answer to the wrong question