←back to thread

GPT-4 and professional benchmarks: the wrong answer to the wrong question

(aisnakeoil.substack.com)
340 points agomez314 | 2 comments | 21 Mar 23 13:12 UTC | HN request time: 0.437s | source
Show context
pontus ◴[21 Mar 23 14:16 UTC] No.35246439[source]▶
While everyone is debating whether this is impressive or dumb, if it's a leap forward in technology or just a rehashing of old ideas with more data, if we should really care that much about it passing the bar exam or if it's all just a parlor trick, people around the world are starting to use this as a tool and getting real results, becoming more productive, and building stuff... Seems like the proof is in the pudding!
replies(2): >>35246513 #>>35248486 #
1. int_19h ◴[21 Mar 23 16:26 UTC] No.35248486[source]▶
One of the major reasons why this all is heavily debated, including by those not in the field at all, is because if those things are really capable of human-like reasoning, it leads to answers for some commonly asked philosophical questions on the nature of human conscience, intellect etc that many people find difficult to accept.
replies(1): >>35248808 #
2. pontus ◴[21 Mar 23 16:44 UTC] No.35248808[source]▶
Yeah, from a philosophical perspective these are interesting questions to ponder, but my impression of these comments is less that people are pondering the depth of consciousness and more that they're trying to be contrarian / naysayers.