←back to thread

340 points agomez314 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
jvanderbot ◴[] No.35245898[source]
Memorization is absolutely the most valuable part of GPT, for me. I can get natural language responses to documentation, basic scripting / sysadmin, and API questions much more easily than searching other ways.

While this is an academic interest point, and rightly tamps down on hype around replacing humans, it doesn't dissuade what I think are most peoples' basic use case: "I don't know or don't remember how to do X, can you show me?"

This is finally a good enough "knowledge reference engine" that I can see being useful to those very people it is over hyped to replace.

replies(6): >>35245958 #>>35245959 #>>35245985 #>>35246065 #>>35246167 #>>35252251 #
soco ◴[] No.35246167[source]
Good luck getting ChatGPT to explain a cron expression like "0 30 5 * * 3". I mean, it will explain, but mixing up everything. How many other mistakes it might make?
replies(7): >>35246247 #>>35246250 #>>35246277 #>>35246542 #>>35247089 #>>35248460 #>>35248921 #
raattgift ◴[] No.35246542[source]
Probably the most fundamental problem of ChatGPT is that it refuses (or is even unable) to admit, "I don't know".
replies(3): >>35246753 #>>35246850 #>>35247503 #
spacebanana7 ◴[] No.35246753[source]
I imagine kind of defect can be fixed with more fine tuning / RHLF
replies(1): >>35247206 #
1. sebzim4500 ◴[] No.35247206[source]
Almost certainly true but they'd have to use a new cost function. It's not just about collecting examples where the model should say "I don't know".