←back to thread

207 points ZephyrBlu | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
hn_throwaway_99 ◴[] No.34952982[source]
Wow, I am so glad I'm not the parent of a teenage girl right now.

At the same time, I wonder if perfect filters like this might actually result in people rejecting beauty standards like this. I mean, if everyone can easily look this good online, if people start to think that it's impossible to determine the veracity of anything that wasn't done face-to-face, maybe people will just start rejecting it. Kind of like how I never answer my phone anymore from numbers I don't know because there is a 95%+ chance it's spam/phishing/etc.

replies(3): >>34953194 #>>34953395 #>>34954661 #
DuckFeathers ◴[] No.34953395[source]
This one time, a colleague of mine was working from home and we had a meeting and when I joined the video call I thought that we had someone new joining the meeting... except when my other colleague said "Hi [HER_NAME]" and I realized who it was. I was shocked that it was the same person.

What beauty filters do can be done using make up... except make up is more deceiving because since we see it in front of our eyes, we are more likely to believe it.

Make up did not change beauty standards and this won't either.

I am looking forward to the time when everyone will look amazing and everyone can live in it their whole lives, never having to see anyone ugly... when all of us transition to living our whole lives in the metaverse.

replies(3): >>34953515 #>>34953518 #>>34953574 #
DiscourseFan ◴[] No.34953515[source]
When all these fools go to live in the "metaverse" the rest of us will be laughing.
replies(1): >>34953623 #
1. Fervicus ◴[] No.34953623[source]
30 years ago, people would probably say the same thing to the idea of social media and people living their lives on their phones.
replies(1): >>34961479 #
2. DiscourseFan ◴[] No.34961479[source]
Well they would be right.