←back to thread

688 points hunglee2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
syzarian ◴[] No.34707465[source]
Seymour doesn’t provide any proof or any evidence. It’s argument by assertion. What he writes is plausible but without any sources or other corroborating evidence. I think it more believable that Seymour has been paid to write this by a Russian aligned entity.

I don’t know the truth of the matter and Seymour could be right. We just can’t tell from the evidence provided.

replies(9): >>34707570 #>>34708763 #>>34709046 #>>34710161 #>>34712925 #>>34712963 #>>34715214 #>>34715699 #>>34757270 #
twoquestions ◴[] No.34712963[source]
My thoughts exactly.

If this is true and more evidence comes out, the usual suspects will be screaming it from the rooftops, if not this narrative will die in obscurity. There's been a lot of misinformation about this war, and a bunch of people who for a variety of reasons want to blame the US for it and are willing to believe some incredible things if they support that narrative.

replies(1): >>34714495 #
pillefitz ◴[] No.34714495[source]
It's really not far fetched to believe the US did it - or any Eastern European country, for that matter.
replies(3): >>34714825 #>>34714832 #>>34715859 #
ROTMetro ◴[] No.34714832[source]
It's really not fat fetched to believe the US didn't do it. Check and mate to your powerful argument.
replies(1): >>34728597 #
1. pillefitz ◴[] No.34728597[source]
I assumed people read the article or any of the comments. In short: Become the EU's main supplier of gas, while weakening Russia. What's not to like? All other actors' benefits pale in comparison. Hell, the US killed millions in for-profit wars, which is a generally accepted fact. Still think it's far-fetched?