←back to thread

688 points hunglee2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
boplicity ◴[] No.34718200[source]
I think I would be very skeptical that this was actually written by Seymour Hersh. This Substack was created today. There's no previous history on it. I can't find any credible evidence that this is actually Seymour Hersh.

If it's not Seymour, it sure is very effective propoganda.

Does anyone see any proof that this is indeed written by the claimed author?

replies(4): >>34718440 #>>34718528 #>>34719262 #>>34720318 #
1. dang ◴[] No.34720318[source]
If it weren't written by Hersh we'd have found out very quickly. By now it's surely clear that it was.