←back to thread

688 points hunglee2 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.234s | source
Show context
boplicity ◴[] No.34718200[source]
I think I would be very skeptical that this was actually written by Seymour Hersh. This Substack was created today. There's no previous history on it. I can't find any credible evidence that this is actually Seymour Hersh.

If it's not Seymour, it sure is very effective propoganda.

Does anyone see any proof that this is indeed written by the claimed author?

replies(4): >>34718440 #>>34718528 #>>34719262 #>>34720318 #
1. joenot443 ◴[] No.34719262[source]
Considering the NY Post, a paper Hersh has a personal relationship with, has already written about this blogpost, I’d be really surprised if it was some kind of impersonation.

Hersh is an online individual like the rest of us, I’m quite sure he’d be aware of papers all over the world reporting on something he hadn’t written.